Search:

Kids Discover
Home


Kindermusik

NO INCOME TAX LAW FORMER "IRS" AGENT JOE BANNISTER PART 1

Kindermusik Videos
Kindermusik Videos Kindermusik Videos
Kindermusik Videos

Joe Bannister explains in a interveiw the 2 year investigation he did, resulted in the IRS forcing him to resign.

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Author: stihlman37

Length: 09:39
Rating: 4.90
Views: 21726

Tags: ALEX  AND  BROWN  ED  ELAINE  FEDRAL  ILLEGAL  INCOME  INFOWARS  INVESTIGATION  IRS  JONES  RESERVE  TAX  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

uuce (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
so what i am getting from this income tax....is............so im paying the irs to work??????hahahhahahaa/....i gotta pay to work...wat a load of crap.VIVA LA REVOLUTION!!!!!!!!!!
eklypse0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Sorry for the errors in spelling. Was interrupted by a Sherrif in commission of his duties. Work is so fun. :p
eklypse0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I do, however dispute that Congress has the power to tax a right. I also dispute that title 26, subsection A allows for the taxation of Americans doing common labor.
eklypse0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Subtitle C is 'employees' which is defined, but dies not include an average American being paid to do work. Subtitle A does comment on iddividualls a lot. But it is all about 'Taxable income'. By there being a taxable income, doesn't it stand to reason that there are incomes that are not taxable? That is the crux of the descussion. I don't doubt that there is part of the Constitution that allows Congress to tax. Nore do I doubt title 26.
RetSquid (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"defined terms such as 'employees' " But, mostly 'individuals'.
eklypse0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
[Read Title 26, it's there.] Title 26 revolves around 'Taxable Income' and specifically title defined terms such as 'employees' which on the surface sounds like everybody and all that comes in. When a critical thinker actually reads them, finds that title 26 is actually far more restrictive then it first appears.
eklypse0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Many people use what I am telling you and standing up to the IRS. Documents of direct correspondence to the IRS show that these people are getting everything back by forcing the IRS to reclassify the earnings as private sector compensation rather then the payers' incorrect claims that they are Income. Search for Lost Horizons and look at the documentation yourself. Would the IRS be giving up this money after such information was indicated if your views were correct?
RetSquid (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You need to do more research from the primary sources, don't depend on other's research that is inaccurate. If you are an individual making over 'X' amount after deductions you owe taxes. Read Title 26, it's there.
eklypse0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
[What is average? As an American citizen.] A person working exclusively in the private sector. If you work for WalMart, the corner store, or even yourself, and etc for any amount of money. That is what I term an average American. People who are not 'Average' in terms of the Income: Politicians, soldiers, Officers of Corporations are examples that are under the 'Income' and 'employment' tax laws under title 26.
eklypse0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
[Yeah, only those who have an income from capitol or labor.] Yep, Income as defined before the 16th was enacted, which I have provided you several times as defined.

Kindermusik Videos © 2007 All Rights Reserved.